by Jason Noble
Update at 4:35 p.m.: House Minority Leader Kevin
McCarthy said Democrats will return to the House chambers and are now
prepared to debate the gun legislation and other bills that have been
delayed by the Democrats’ absence for more than six hours.
In a press conference moments ago, McCarthy said the Democrats walked
out of the Capitol in protest this morning, but spent the day holding
an “off-campus” caucus meeting to work through their position on the gun
legislation. He reiterated his contention that Republicans sprung
debate on the controversial bills on Democrats at the last moment, when
they had no time to prepare amendments or develop a debate strategy.
He also said he expected Republicans to replace the language
currently found in a proposed constitutional amendment with much
stronger wording that would nullify many existing gun laws. That
prompted the flight from the Capitol.
“This morning we found out mid-morning that they intended to alter
the Iowa constitution today to eliminate all gun laws. All gun laws
regarding transporting, carrying, acquiring. All gun laws, gone. …”
McCarthy said.
Now, after meeting extensively, he said, the Democrats are ready to proceed on the bills.
“So now we’re going to go up and we’ll have the debate,” he said. “I
don’t know what order of the debate they’ll have, but we’re going to go
up and have a debate so people know what kind of agenda that Republicans
are pursuing. We’re still here. It’s still daylight.”
The House reconvened at about 4:40 p.m., and opened debate, although the gun legislation was not immediately brought up.
Update at 3:45 p.m.: House Democrats will hold a press conference at the Capitol at 4:15 p.m.
Update at 3:20 p.m.: House Speaker Kraig Paulsen met
with reporters at about 3 p.m. to say he had
spoken by phone with
Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, but received no word as to where the
Democrats were or when they would return to the Capitol.
Republicans will remain “at ease” in the House chambers for the time
being, Paulsen said, in hopes that the Democrats will return yet today.
“The right thing for them to do is to get back here and do the work
that Iowans sent us here to do,” he said. “We’ll be patient a little bit
longer and see if they can make a decision here and give me something
more definitive to work with.”
Paulsen said that McCarthy suggested during the four or five minute
call that Democrats would return if Republicans tabled the two gun bills
that prompted them to leave. But that’s a non-starter for the GOP.
“Someone doesn’t get to have a tantrum and leave the Capitol and all the
sudden we’re changing the debate schedule. That’s not how that works,”
Paulsen said.
Paulsen said he was not certain yet how he would proceed in the hours
to come. His could decide to adjourn for the day at any time, or to
remain convened through the evening and night.
“It wouldn’t be the first time,” he said when asked about the potential for remaining in session over night.
Original post:
Iowa House Democrats protested Republican plans to debate two gun
measures on Wednesday by leaving the state Capitol and refusing to
return. As of 2 p.m., the 40-member Democratic caucus had been gone for
about four hours.
The walkout has disrupted nearly a day’s worth of legislative
business and garnered national attention likening it to recent protests
against Republican priorities by Democrats in Wisconsin and elsewhere.
At issue are bills seeking to broaden Iowa’s “Castle Doctrine”
allowing individuals to defend themselves with deadly force and a
proposal to write the right to bear arms into the state constitution.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, D-Des Moines accused Republican
House Leader Linda Upmeyer of failing to properly inform legislators
about plans to debate the bills this morning, leaving Democrats without
time to draw up and offer changes to them.
“She said they will debate those bills today whether we like it or
not,” McCarthy told the Des Moines Register on Wednesday morning, as
Democrats were leaving the Capitol. “I told her that we’ve been double
crossed, and we will not be debating those bills today.”
He later circulated a scanned copy of the House calendar, on which he
said Upmeyer had circled the bills she intended to bring up for debate.
The gun measures were not among those circled. (Here is a copy of the calendar.)
Republicans hold a 60-to-40 majority in the House, which allows them to
set the calendar for debate and largely control the legislative
process.
“We have been double-crossed as a caucus, and we’re not going to sit
back and be treated with historic misuse of power,” McCarthy said.
But Upmeyer, R-Garner, shot back that Democrats did have adequate
warning, and suggested their flight from the Capitol was an attempt to
make a political scene.
“Iowans didn’t send us down here just to do easy stuff,” she said.
“The Second Amendment is a question that many Iowans would like placed
before them. I don’t know why they’re afraid to have a debate on a
subject just because they don’t like the subject. That seems ludicrous
to me.”
In a statement released after the Democrats exited the Capitol,
McCarthy said the Republican leadership told Democrats yesterday the gun
legislation would not be considered today. Because they didn’t believe
the bill would come up today, he said, Democrats did not file all the
amendments they hoped to offer on the bills prior to the deadline set in
the House rules.
Upmeyer rejected that argument. The gun bills were noticed in the
same manner as any other bill that could come before the House, she said
— in a calendar that is updated and circulated to lawmakers every day.
When Democrats asked what the Republicans intended to bring up on
Wednesday, Upmeyer said she gave them a list of non-controversial bills,
but left consideration of other bills “open-ended.”
“Every member knows that anything that comes out of committee and is placed on the calendar is eligible,” Upmeyer said.
A House spokeswoman added that Democrats had in fact already offered
an amendment to one of the gun bills, indicating that they had had ample
time to develop proposed changes.
The Democrats’ move to an undisclosed location has disrupted most of
the legislative action planned for the day. Republicans had intended to
debate 11 bills in addition to the gun bills and hold several committee
meetings. None of the debate took place, and all the committee work was
delayed.
Shortly after noon, the House held an event commemorating Black
History Month featuring a proclamation from Gov. Terry Branstad and
several guests, some of whom had traveled from across the state.
The Democrats’ absence led organizers to curtail the event,
shortening what was to be an hour-long program featuring singing and
dancing to a mere 10-minute reading of the governor’s remarks and
proclamation. Two massive sheet cakes brought for lawmakers to
commemorate the military service of the Tuskegee Airmen went uneaten in
the office behind the House chamber.
Speaking to reporters afterward, Branstad chided Democrats for ducking their responsibilities as lawmakers.
“I don’t think it’s a wise thing to do,” Branstad said. “I’ve been in
the minority and I’ve been in the majority in the legislature and I’ve
always felt that the best thing to do is to not be afraid to state your
position.”
Besides the Black History Month event and a short private caucus
meeting, the left-behind Republican lawmakers spent the day lounging at
their desks and chatting in small groups on the House floor.
Upmeyer and House Speaker Kraig Paulsen, R-Hiawatha, did attempt to
contact McCarthy, but received no response, House spokeswoman Josie
Albrecht said.
The Democrats’ exit, Branstad and several longtime lawmakers said, is
unprecedented in recent memory. Branstad, who served in the legislature
in the 1970s and also was governor from 1983 to 1999, said he could not
recall a similar situation in Iowa.
“I think most people think that when you’re elected to serve, you should be there when duty calls,” Branstad said.
Longtime lawmaker Stewart Iverson, R-Clarion, said it’s not uncommon
for a party caucus to hold an extended private meeting in order to delay
consideration of a bill, but that he couldn’t recall lawmakers leaving
the Capitol and remain incommunicado as the Democrats did Wednesday.
“It’s a little unusual that they actually left the building, but it’s
not unusual to go to caucus and spend several hours there,” Iverson
said.
House rules do allow lawmakers to compel absent colleagues to return
to the Capitol to debate legislation – including sending law enforcement
to retrieve them. That step was not been seriously discussed on
Wednesday, Albrecht said.
The walkout generated responses from within and without Iowa in the news and on social media.
In a tweet, Iowa Democratic Party Chairwoman Sue Dvorsky accused the
House Republicans of employing “lousy tactics” and implored House
Democrats to “be strong.”
In a subsequent statement, Dvorsky expanded on that point: “The House
Republicans have shown time and again that they are unwilling to govern
in a manner that gets results and moves Iowa forward,” she said in the
statement. “Their abuse of power this morning shows that they are more
concerned about breaking the rules in order to push through dangerous
bills than work with Democrats to create jobs, grow our economy, and
support education in this state.”
A tweet from Rep. Nick Wagner, R-Marion, meanwhile, put the
responsibility on the absent Democrats: “Waiting in the chamber for the
Dems to come back to the capitol so we can get to work,” he wrote
shortly at 11 a.m.
Seizing on a Facebook post, Republicans accused one Democrat of
shirking her legislative responsibilities to attend a basketball game.
Rep. Sharon Steckman, D-Mason City, posted on her Facebook page at 7:21 a.m. this morning: “GO MOHAWKS!!!! Looks like I will be able to make the game:)”
The Mason City Mohawks girls basketball team was scheduled to play in the state tournament at 11:45 a.m. today at Wells Fargo Arena, a few blocks from the Capitol.
Steckman clarified this afternoon that her Facebook comment was made
hours before the controversy over the gun bills arose, and referred to
the resolution of a different scheduling conflict that she had thought
would prevent her from attending the game.
Chris Rager, a lobbyist for the National Rifle Association, described
Wednesday’s outcome as “disappointing.” He noted that some Democrats
have voiced support for some of the bills.
“I haven’t heard from Rep. McCarthy on it but I know he has supported
us on gun legislation in the past,” Rager said. “I’m a little confused
that he didn’t keep the caucus here. I would have thought he would have
been supportive of this legislation.”
Gun-rights activists from elsewhere were similarly critical. The
Bellevue, Wash.,-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear
Arms released a statement this afternoon knocking Iowa Democrats.
“Once again, Democrats have painted themselves as the party of gun
control by disappearing rather than debating measures to strengthen the
firearm civil rights of Iowa citizens,” said Alan Gottlieb, the chairman
of the committee.
Here are the bills:
House Joint Resolution 2009: Iowa Right to Keep and Bear Arms State Constitutional Amendment
This resolution would begin a process to amend Iowa’s constitution to
include a “right to keep and bear arms.” The proposed amendment echoes
the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, saying “The right of the
people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
To pass, the resolution must be approved by both the House and the
Senate in two consecutive general assemblies before voters would weigh
in on the issue. It means that the earliest a vote could occur would be
2013, should the legislature act this year and next.
House File 2215: Reasonable force/Stand your ground
The bill would rewrites the law on “reasonable force” so that a
person may use force — including deadly force — against someone who they
believe threatens to kill or cause serious injury, or who is committing
a violent felony. The bill specifically says that a person is presumed
to be justified in using deadly force if the person reasonably believes
that deadly force is necessary to avoid injury or risk to his or her
life.
Iowa’s current law allows potential victims to use deadly force
against a perceived threat only if an alternative course of action also
entails “a risk to life or safety.”
http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2012/02/29/house-democrats-have-left-the-iowa-capitol-in-protest-in-an-undisclosed-location/
No comments:
Post a Comment